As I began writing my first interpretive essay I struggled with what was expected of me as a writer which led me to over-think what my rhetorical audience should be. Because of this I had trouble defining my purpose as well as my context, medium and strategy. My instructor said; "This draft is impressive, considering that you had a bit of a rough start figuring out what I was going for in the thesis/statement of purpose assignment." It wasn't until my revision that I realized that I can use Kalman's essay as a structural model in which I could write my essay. By looking at how she interpreted the world around her gave me insight on how I should interpret her essay. This allowed me to understand my purpose, context, audience and gave me a sense of what my medium should be. I used this same strategy with my next two essays.
For the Neufeld essay I discovered that my essay should convey the disgust the comic made me feel when I read it. It made me feel a sense of disgust toward our government, our media, and disgust of what society feels about the lower class or those below the poverty line - that they are just not that important. Because this was a comic though I felt a strange need to mention the colors that he used. I thought that I should demonstrate how these colors blended with the story that he told, how effective his drawings were and how his characters sprung to life. I think these things were effective and influential in telling his story.
Junod's article was a little more difficult though. I had a hard time figuring out what I want to mention because he gave us so much material to work with. My purpose was clear - I didn't want the Falling Man to be forgotten either. Junod's article was touching and inspirational and I wanted to make sure that this essay would give my audience the same remarkable feelings that Junod gave me. This I used for my strategy. Figuring out my context for this would be a challenge because again, there was so much to work with! So to stay in context I made sure to only mention what I could use to convey the points in my essay. I also had the pleasure of quoting Junod in different ways which made the essay a little more fun to write because I got to play with different quoting techniques.
As long as I keep these same strategies and techniques in mind, I am sure I will be able to continue writing with the same degree of influence and inspiration as these talented writers.
Keep your pencils sharp and your wit sharper.
The Junod essay was also difficult for me to write. I didn't really know what to focus on while the author's texts were more easy to follow.
ReplyDelete